Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: W3C process call, 27 November

Note that David just sent a "no call November 26th" mail.  :)

On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 9:33 AM Michael Champion <
Michael.Champion@microsoft.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the whiteboard picture!  I’m curious about a few things:
>
>
>
> - What are the major changes  to the Everteal flow since the presentations
> at TPAC?
>
>
>
> - Can Everteal create a plausible “living standard” option without patent
> policy changes?
>
>
>
> - If not, what’s the W3M/AB plan to get a patent policy update in 6
> months?  Does it seems feasible for the “living standard” aspects of
> Everteal to reference an experimental patent policy but improvements to
> facilitate well-maintained Recommendations reference the existing patent
> policy?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
> *Date: *Tuesday, November 26, 2019 at 5:41 AM
> *To: *Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, public-w3process@w3.org <
> public-w3process@w3.org>
> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] Re: W3C process call, 27 November
>
> I'm available.
>
> fyi, I'll do a call with the team contacts on December 12 to ensure that
> they are up-to-speed with EverTeal and gets their feedback on how it
> gets presented.
>
> Following the AB session last week, I drew the following on my board:
>
> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2F12%2Feverteal-whiteboard.jpg&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cmichael.champion%40microsoft.com%7Cdae75665059442f75aa808d7727647b3%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637103724649132155&amp;sdata=%2BC2YzaWiw7ieqSa%2BD3guLicGiM15osDbHbFj0UWFOk8%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
> Philippe
>
> On 11/25/2019 10:02 PM, Jeff Jaffe wrote:
> > My calendar shows a W3C process call this week, but I know that our
> > Chair - David Singer is on vacation this week.  I suspect many other US
> > participants are also out on Wednesday.  On the other hand, I have not
> > seen a cancellation notice.
> >
> > I suggest that we not have a formal agenda going through all of the
> > issues that David always prepares for us.  But if people are interested,
> > I would not mind having an informal meeting.  Two useful things to
> > discuss are:
> >
> >   * A summary of the AB's discussion last week about Continuous
> >     Development, the Patent Policy, Registries, and Process 2020.
> >   * A discussion of a possible timetable to get Process 2020 to AC
> >     review by March, and AC approval by June.
> >
> > LMK what people think about such a call.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >
>