- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 02:55:42 +0200
- To: W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
(Because it's 3am.) We were given an action to propose an alternative to the “Evergreen Standards” proposal in https://www.w3.org/wiki/Evergreen_Standards which redefines an entirely new standards track, which is problematic because it forks every aspect of the *entire* process (which is error-prone, to understate the problem), fails to maintain the aspects of the W3C Process that functionally ensure consensus and wide review, and overdefines other aspects, leading to inflexibility where the current Process is more adaptable. Here's the initial draft: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Maintainable_Standards Looking forward to arguing with you all tomorrow. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2019 00:56:08 UTC