Everblue Standards :D

(Because it's 3am.)

We were given an action to propose an alternative to the “Evergreen Standards” 
proposal in https://www.w3.org/wiki/Evergreen_Standards which redefines an 
entirely new standards track, which is problematic because it forks every 
aspect of the *entire* process (which is error-prone, to understate the 
problem), fails to maintain the aspects of the W3C Process that functionally 
ensure consensus and wide review, and overdefines other aspects, leading to 
inflexibility where the current Process is more adaptable.

Here's the initial draft: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Maintainable_Standards

Looking forward to arguing with you all tomorrow.


Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2019 00:56:08 UTC