Re: DRAFT-R1 agenda for the next Process Call, Oct 3rd (note odd week) 7am PDT from David Singer on 2018-10-03 (public-w3process@w3.org from October 2018)

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 20:20:56 -0700
To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
Cc: W3C Process CG <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-id: <854A8B04-6A7F-4688-9881-728C191F29B5@apple.com>

> On Oct 2, 2018, at 17:30 , Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> Can we make #79 the highest priority among these?
> 

How so?  I am unaware of any 

a) substantive feedback from the AB on the process discussion
b) substantive feedback from a constituency wanting to use an Evergreen process (‘we want to use it but we think <this> needs <that>’)

I can’t see how to make progress without at least one customer and active revision/review/approval by at least the AB and process CG.

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2018 03:21:21 UTC