- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 23:31:25 -0400
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: W3C Process CG <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 10/2/2018 11:20 PM, David Singer wrote: > >> On Oct 2, 2018, at 17:30 , Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote: >> >> Can we make #79 the highest priority among these? >> > How so? I am unaware of any > > a) substantive feedback from the AB on the process discussion Since the last Process call I added the use cases section. > b) substantive feedback from a constituency wanting to use an Evergreen process (‘we want to use it but we think <this> needs <that>’) This is a chicken-and-egg problem. The process is not yet clear enough for a constituency to stand up to say they will use it. That is why the Process CG needs to make more progress. > > I can’t see how to make progress without at least one customer and active revision/review/approval by at least the AB and process CG. > > > David Singer > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. >
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2018 03:31:27 UTC