Re: DRAFT-R1 agenda for the next Process Call, Oct 3rd (note odd week) 7am PDT

On 10/2/2018 11:20 PM, David Singer wrote:
>
>> On Oct 2, 2018, at 17:30 , Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>> Can we make #79 the highest priority among these?
>>
> How so?  I am unaware of any
>
> a) substantive feedback from the AB on the process discussion

Since the last Process call I added the use cases section.

> b) substantive feedback from a constituency wanting to use an Evergreen process (‘we want to use it but we think <this> needs <that>’)

This is a chicken-and-egg problem.  The process is not yet clear enough 
for a constituency to stand up to say they will use it. That is why the 
Process CG needs to make more progress.

>
> I can’t see how to make progress without at least one customer and active revision/review/approval by at least the AB and process CG.
>
>
> David Singer
> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>

Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2018 03:31:27 UTC