- From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 16:22:53 +0000
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 18/12/2018 21:48, David Singer wrote: > > >> On Dec 18, 2018, at 6:13 , Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote: >> >>> I agree, the focus on interesting and significant issues problem remains. But that’s almost the nature of standards work, as Chaals points out — people work on what they are motivated to work on. It’s hard to change that. We can’t *tell* people to do anything. >> >> True. Is there any way to give the priority issues more oxygen in/on calls than non-priority issues perhaps? > > They are always the first things on the agenda; and sometimes we note that no progress has been made, and move on… > > we make sure that someone is assigned to them; we ask what the next steps are; what else can be done? > Probably not much else. I take it there were no constructive suggestions from the critics? > > David Singer > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. > -- @LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2018 16:23:37 UTC