- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:48:12 -0800
- To: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
- Cc: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
> On Dec 18, 2018, at 6:13 , Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote: > >> I agree, the focus on interesting and significant issues problem remains. But that’s almost the nature of standards work, as Chaals points out — people work on what they are motivated to work on. It’s hard to change that. We can’t *tell* people to do anything. > > True. Is there any way to give the priority issues more oxygen in/on calls than non-priority issues perhaps? They are always the first things on the agenda; and sometimes we note that no progress has been made, and move on… we make sure that someone is assigned to them; we ask what the next steps are; what else can be done? David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2018 21:48:37 UTC