- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:48:33 -0500
- To: tink@tink.uk, David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 12/19/2018 11:22 AM, Léonie Watson wrote: > > On 18/12/2018 21:48, David Singer wrote: >> >> >>> On Dec 18, 2018, at 6:13 , Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote: >>> >>>> I agree, the focus on interesting and significant issues problem >>>> remains. But that’s almost the nature of standards work, as Chaals >>>> points out — people work on what they are motivated to work on. >>>> It’s hard to change that. We can’t *tell* people to do anything. >>> >>> True. Is there any way to give the priority issues more oxygen in/on >>> calls than non-priority issues perhaps? >> >> They are always the first things on the agenda; and sometimes we note >> that no progress has been made, and move on… >> >> we make sure that someone is assigned to them; we ask what the next >> steps are; what else can be done? >> > Probably not much else. I take it there were no constructive > suggestions from the critics? Well I did suggest assigning each priority task to a volunteer that feels passionate about driving it. Then they can form a team of interested parties to develop their task. > >> >> David Singer >> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. >> >
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2018 16:48:37 UTC