- From: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:37:47 -0400
- To: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex.ru>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
On 09/27/2017 04:46 PM, Chaals McCathie Nevile wrote: > On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 19:27:25 +0200, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote: > >> >> On 27/09/2017 12:31, David Singer wrote: >>> Some responses to this would be appreciated. >>> We intend to ‘freeze’ top-of-tree during AC review, so the document >>> at github.io remains unchanged. Issues and pull requests that land as >>> part of AC review will be held (or a branch will be made) so the AC >>> has a consistent document to comment on. >> >> Makes sense. Suggest taking a branch as the stable snapshot, and >> allowing subsequent edits to happen on the default branch. > > +1 +1 > >>> 1) Leonie proposes removing the somewhat-redundant word ‘public’ >>> before ‘working draft’ EXCEPT in the phrase First Public Working >>> Draft, since all WDs are by definition public. See >>> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/104>, responding to >>> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/84>. OK? > > +1 No opinion on the change, but editorially, it looks fine to me. > >>> 2) <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/105> and >>> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/106> make the change to the >>> process to restore the formal ballot at Proposed rec instead of at >>> CR. Implements the decision on issue #34. Do we need the process to >>> say that nonetheless the AC will be given early comment opportunity >>> (around CR)? >> >> Have commented on the PR. I don't understand the logic of reverting to >> a ballot at PR, but if I'm the only one who thinks this I'm not going >> to die on this hill because of it. > > Ditto to Léonie. Team and participants have found the long ballot confusing. Thanks for helping us revert to something more understandable. We will of course continue to encourage early feedback. > >>> 3) There are a few other editorial issues and pull requests, see >>> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/labels/Editorial%20improvements>. >>> Do you mind if we land these ASAP before AC review starts? > > +1 +1 --Wendy > > Cheers > > -- Wendy Seltzer -- wseltzer@w3.org +1.617.715.4883 (office) Strategy Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) https://wendy.seltzer.org/ +1.617.863.0613 (mobile)
Received on Wednesday, 27 September 2017 21:37:50 UTC