- From: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex.ru>
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 22:46:34 +0200
- To: "David Singer" <singer@apple.com>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 19:27:25 +0200, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote: > > On 27/09/2017 12:31, David Singer wrote: >> Some responses to this would be appreciated. >> We intend to ‘freeze’ top-of-tree during AC review, so the document at >> github.io remains unchanged. Issues and pull requests that land as part >> of AC review will be held (or a branch will be made) so the AC has a >> consistent document to comment on. > > Makes sense. Suggest taking a branch as the stable snapshot, and > allowing subsequent edits to happen on the default branch. +1 >> 1) Leonie proposes removing the somewhat-redundant word ‘public’ >> before ‘working draft’ EXCEPT in the phrase First Public Working Draft, >> since all WDs are by definition public. See >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/104>, responding to >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/84>. OK? +1 >> 2) <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/105> and >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/106> make the change to the >> process to restore the formal ballot at Proposed rec instead of at CR. >> Implements the decision on issue #34. Do we need the process to say >> that nonetheless the AC will be given early comment opportunity (around >> CR)? > > Have commented on the PR. I don't understand the logic of reverting to a > ballot at PR, but if I'm the only one who thinks this I'm not going to > die on this hill because of it. Ditto to Léonie. >> 3) There are a few other editorial issues and pull requests, see >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/labels/Editorial%20improvements>. Do >> you mind if we land these ASAP before AC review starts? +1 Cheers -- Chaals is Charles McCathie Nevile find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Wednesday, 27 September 2017 20:46:59 UTC