W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > July 2016

Re: Wording question on update to 2.1.1

From: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 02:08:58 +0200
To: public-w3process@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.ykvhc8uos7agh9@77.88.19.227-red.dhcp.yndx.net>
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 19:44:46 +0200, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi Chaals and CG,
>
> I'm reviewing the process update, and noted this addition:
>  https://www.w3.org/2016/07/18-Process2016-diff.html#MemberBenefits
>
> "For all representatives of a Member that is a Consortium, as described
> in the preceeding two paragraphs, any IPR contributions are only those
> of the individual person or Consortium they are representing as no IPR
> commitments have been granted by the individuals' employers. "
>
> Suggest:
> s/as no IPR commitments have been granted by the individuals'
> employers/unless IPR commitments have been granted by the individuals'
> employers/
>
> While we would not as a matter of course get those commitments, it's
> possible that we would ask for and receive them.

+1 - I think this would be an improvement.

> also typos: s/preceeding/preceding/
> s/individual person or Consortium/individual person and Consortium/

Noted. I'll fix them in the next draft - thanks.

cheers

-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
  chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2016 00:09:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:51:38 UTC