- From: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 02:08:58 +0200
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 19:44:46 +0200, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org> wrote: > Hi Chaals and CG, > > I'm reviewing the process update, and noted this addition: > https://www.w3.org/2016/07/18-Process2016-diff.html#MemberBenefits > > "For all representatives of a Member that is a Consortium, as described > in the preceeding two paragraphs, any IPR contributions are only those > of the individual person or Consortium they are representing as no IPR > commitments have been granted by the individuals' employers. " > > Suggest: > s/as no IPR commitments have been granted by the individuals' > employers/unless IPR commitments have been granted by the individuals' > employers/ > > While we would not as a matter of course get those commitments, it's > possible that we would ask for and receive them. +1 - I think this would be an improvement. > also typos: s/preceeding/preceding/ > s/individual person or Consortium/individual person and Consortium/ Noted. I'll fix them in the next draft - thanks. cheers -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2016 00:09:31 UTC