Re: Revising Appeals of Directors Decisions following an AC Review, Part 1 of 2

I'm wondering about the case where he made the decision not to advance.

On Aug 26, 2016 11:50 AM, "David Singer" <singer@mac.com> wrote:

>
> > On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:52 , timeless <timeless@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> >> REPLACEMENT: "The Advisory Committee representatives MAY initiate an
> >> Advisory Committee
> >> appeal<http://www.w3.org/2015/04/Process-20150428/#ACAppeal> to the W3C
> >> Decision to advance the technical report."
> >
> > to advance => on advancing
>
> really?  he made a ‘decision to advance the technical report’, i.e. a
> decision to do something.  it sounds right to me…
>
> >
>
> Dave Singer
>
> singer@mac.com
>
>