- From: David Singer <singer@mac.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 16:47:17 -0700
- To: timeless@gmail.com
- Cc: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
Oh, then we should be clear “on whether to advance”? > On Aug 28, 2016, at 6:56 , timeless <timeless@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm wondering about the case where he made the decision not to advance. > > > On Aug 26, 2016 11:50 AM, "David Singer" <singer@mac.com> wrote: > > > On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:52 , timeless <timeless@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com> wrote: > >> REPLACEMENT: "The Advisory Committee representatives MAY initiate an > >> Advisory Committee > >> appeal<http://www.w3.org/2015/04/Process-20150428/#ACAppeal> to the W3C > >> Decision to advance the technical report." > > > > to advance => on advancing > > really? he made a ‘decision to advance the technical report’, i.e. a decision to do something. it sounds right to me… > > > > > Dave Singer > > singer@mac.com > Dave Singer singer@mac.com
Received on Monday, 29 August 2016 23:47:49 UTC