- From: Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:52:45 +0000
- To: David Singer <singer@mac.com>, "timeless@gmail.com" <timeless@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Sounds right as is to me as well Steve Z > -----Original Message----- > From: David Singer [mailto:singer@mac.com] > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 8:50 AM > To: timeless@gmail.com > Cc: Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>; public-w3process@w3.org > Subject: Re: Revising Appeals of Directors Decisions following an AC Review, > Part 1 of 2 > > > > On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:52 , timeless <timeless@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com> wrote: > >> REPLACEMENT: "The Advisory Committee representatives MAY initiate an > >> Advisory Committee > >> appeal<http://www.w3.org/2015/04/Process-20150428/#ACAppeal> to > the > >> W3C Decision to advance the technical report." > > > > to advance => on advancing > > really? he made a ‘decision to advance the technical report’, i.e. a decision to > do something. it sounds right to me… > > > > > Dave Singer > > singer@mac.com
Received on Friday, 26 August 2016 15:53:17 UTC