Re: [closed] Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]

thank you!


we should surely tell the chairs what they need to do to trigger this!  (or rather, what not to do that would cause this filter not to work)



> On May 20, 2015, at 5:23 , Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 09:34:59 +0200, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org> wrote:
> 
>> [This is in response to:
>>   https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Apr/0023.html
>> ... quoted below. It should be threaded in the mail archive and your MUA.]
>> 
>> Hello all,
>> 
>> I heard there were discussions on this list about making use of public-review-announce which match my team's interests in looking at how to publicise work, encourage wide-review etc.
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Belatedly closing the loop on that thread.
> Philippe Le Hégaret and the Systems team worked to implement automatic notification to public-review-announce@w3.org.
> 
> Coralie
> 
> ------- Forwarded message -------
> From: "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>
> To: "Coralie Mercier" <coralie@w3.org>, "Ted Guild" <ted@w3.org>, "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
> Cc: "w3t-comm@w3.org" <w3t-comm@w3.org>, chaals@yandex-team.ru
> Subject: Re: Fwd: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
> Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 23:29:16 +0200
> 
> The transition notifier is now activated. See the notifications generated
> in
>   https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-review-announce/2015May/
> 
> It notifies FPWD, LCWD, CR, and WD mentioning "wide review" in their
> status.
> 
> Philippe
> 
> On 04/08/2015 05:28 AM, Coralie Mercier wrote:
>> 
>> [ - w3t-pr@, + w3t-comm@, + plh@, + ted@, + ij@]
>> 
>> Hi Ted, Philippe, sysfolks and Ian,
>> chaals, Comm team,
>> 
>> 
>> chaals' request below in context: <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Apr/thread.html#msg11>.
>> 
>> I believe that things related to publications (policies and tools) recently moved from Ian to Ted and Philippe.
>> 
>> I read the thread in <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Nov/thread.html#msg62>, which I was not very familiar with and which refers to the "Publications team" and "PubTeam". I take this to mean Ted and some sysfolks and possibly Philippe. Ian was involved as well it appears.
>> 
>> My understanding is that in addition to the "Tool to Assist with Calls for Specification Review" <http://www.w3.org/2014/11/getreview/>, the specific proposed PubTeam work item is: implement automatic notification to public-review-announce@w3.org supported by the following requests:
>> 
>> [[ has to be automatic for all the obvious events
>>  FPWD
>>  LCWD
>>  Transition requests/Transitions
>>  Exclusion opportunities
>>  Incoming liaisons, maybe ]]
>> cf. David's message <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Apr/0020.html>, Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 15:32:43 -0700
>> 
>> [[ I would also expect the PubTeam to automagically
>> announce all FPWD and LCWD publications on that list. ]]
>> cf. Art's message <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Nov/0065.html>, Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 20:31:25 -0500
>> 
>> This is directly related to a recent Global discussion on "How to do reviews of WDs without an LC?", and the broader issue of seeking (horizontal) reviews also came up at the W3C Europe site meeting this week.
>> cf. https://www.w3.org/2015/03/26-global-minutes#item05
>>    https://www.w3.org/2015/04/07-weum-minutes#item01
>> 
>> 
>> How easy is it to implement the above automatic notifications in the publication work-flow? is there an ETA?
>> How may I help move things forward? (other than planning promotion according to feasibility and ETA)
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> Coralie
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, 06 Apr 2015 23:01:09 +0200, <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> this is about communications, but requires a step in publishing to make it simple enough to happen without people having to do a lot of work...
>>> 
>>> hope I have the right people to move that - and that it can be automated pretty trivially. IMHO it doesn't need to be a carefully crafted message, it's just a basic informative statement "FPWD XYZ was published at https://blabla with abstract kvbtatebva;ubetaunetouvnaet;obtibon"
>>> 
>>> cheers
>>> 
>>> -------- Beginning of forwarded message  --------
>>> 06.04.2015, 22:58, "chaals@yandex-team.ru" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>:
>>> 
>>> I'll be forwarding this to the people who actually do things like this, in the hopes that helps. It would be really useful…
>>> 
>>> cheers
>>> 
>>> 06.04.2015, 22:55, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@gmail.com>:
>>>> On 4/6/15 4:04 PM, Phillips, Addison wrote:
>>>>>  I agree with Chaals that FPWD is a good time to start the review process.
>>>> Me three and to facilitate the FPWD discovery part, several months ago
>>>> ([ab]) I proposed the Pub Team `automagically` announce FPWD
>>>> publications on [p-r-a] but that has never been done :-(.
>>>> 
>>>> -AB
>>>> 
>>>> [ab]
>>>> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Nov/0065.html>  [p-r-a] <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-review-announce/>
>>> 
>>> -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
>>> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
>>> -------- End of forwarded message --------
> 
> -- 
> Coralie Mercier  -  W3C Marketing & Communications -  http://www.w3.org
> mailto:coralie@w3.org +336 4322 0001 http://www.w3.org/People/CMercier/
> 

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.