chaals@yandex-team.ru
- Re: Possible item for discussion for 2016 -- Charter adjustments
- Re: Thoughts on culture -esp. chairs and versions Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
Coralie Mercier
Daniel Glazman
David Singer
- Re: [closed] Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- Re: The Community Group to Working Group transition, starting discussion
- The Community Group to Working Group transition, starting discussion
- Re: Possible item for discussion for 2016 -- Charter adjustments
- Re: Possible item for discussion for 2016 -- Charter adjustments
- Possible item for discussion for 2016 -- Charter adjustments
- Re: Thoughts on culture -esp. chairs and versions Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
Jeff Jaffe
- Re: Possible item for discussion for 2016 -- Charter adjustments
- Re: Possible item for discussion for 2016 -- Charter adjustments
Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
- w3process-ISSUE-163 (consortium membership): How should consortia which are members of W3C nominate representatives and commit IPR? [Process Document]
- w3process-ISSUE-162 (Representing multiple groups): Should participants in Working Groups be allowed to represent more than one organisation? [Process Document]
Stephen Zilles
- Cancelled: Process Document Task Force Telcon Tuesday,26 May 2015
- Results of AC discussion of Process 2015 and 2016.
- Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 19 May 2015
Tim Berners-Lee
Wayne Carr
- Re: The Community Group to Working Group transition, starting discussion
- Re: Possible item for discussion for 2016 -- Charter adjustments
- Re: Possible item for discussion for 2016 -- Charter adjustments