- From: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 17:29:02 -0700
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
- Message-ID: <556CF8CE.9020805@linux.intel.com>
It looks like one of the two was made - the new definition of editorial changes at http://www.w3.org/2015/04/Process-20150428/#editorial-change Is it just the change to not make editorial changes go back to PR that wasn't made? On 2015-06-01 10:13, Stephen Zilles wrote: > > All, > > In reviewing topics for Process 2016, I happened to note that the > change described in > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Apr/0114.html > > to allow editorial changes to be made without AC Review had not been > made in the Proposed Process that just completed its Review ballot. > > This change should be immediately made to the Draft Process 2016 > Editor’s draft. > > Till then we must keep the relevant Issues “pending review”. > > https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/152 > <https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/152> > > https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/157 > <https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/157> > > Steve Z >
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2015 00:29:47 UTC