I agree that we should normally conduct our business member-visible, so I think the form is right in this default. Is that the question, that we should align the process and practice?
cheers
-----Original Message-----
From: Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 10:23 AM
To: public-w3process@w3.org
Subject: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document]
w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document]
http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/154
Raised by: Charles McCathie Nevile
On product: Process Document
This should be a tiny issue, so I hope we can resolve it in passing.
In section 8.1.1 on AC reviews it says [1] [[[The Team must provide two channels for Advisory Committee review comments:
+ an archived Team-only channel; this is the default channel for reviews.
]]]
Does there need to be a default channel?
I would suggest not, others have suggested it is helpful - and others have suggested it is helpful if it is to publish it to the world.
--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.