Re: Draft for Last Call

On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:44:04 +0100, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org> wrote:

> On 3/9/2014 8:03 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> following the AB meeting, and incorporation of the last editorial
>> comments, I have produced a draft for the AB to check and hopefully
>> approve as a Last Call (to be proposed incorporated into a full version
>> of the Process Document).
>>
>> The document is at
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/13a947c0bdc9/tr.html and changes are
>> detailed at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/
>
> I don't see the inclusion of text per the discussion scribed below.  Am
> I overlooking it somewhere?

No, it seems that I just dreamed putting it in :(

Later today I will release a new draft, with this and the suggestions that  
came from Wayne.

cheers

> [[
> Ralph: Something just came up in an internal conversation
> ... the question is when we're rescinding a W3C Rec
>
> <Ralph> Rescinding a Recommendation
>
> Ralph: Text in the current process says that there is a publication of a
> rescinded Re[c] announced that encourages the Team to update the status
> of the thing that was rescinded
> ... to note this is no longer a Rec
> ... in my reading, there is no language in the current proposal to
> suggest the Team should update a W3C Rec is rescinded
>
> chaals: I agree, and there should be; obvious oversight.
>
> Ralph: The current process doesn't suggest how it should be done, just
> that it should be done
> ... The current proposal doesn't even have a suggestion
>
> SteveZ: Accepted
>
> chaals: WFM
>
> Ralph: I'll provide specific language, if you wish.
> ... Do you need to see specific language? [no]
> ]]
>
>
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> Chaals
>>
>


-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2014 11:19:06 UTC