- From: Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 08:44:04 -0400
- To: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- CC: public-w3process@w3.org
On 3/9/2014 8:03 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile wrote: > Hi, > > following the AB meeting, and incorporation of the last editorial > comments, I have produced a draft for the AB to check and hopefully > approve as a Last Call (to be proposed incorporated into a full version > of the Process Document). > > The document is at > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/13a947c0bdc9/tr.html and changes are > detailed at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/ I don't see the inclusion of text per the discussion scribed below. Am I overlooking it somewhere? [[ Ralph: Something just came up in an internal conversation ... the question is when we're rescinding a W3C Rec <Ralph> Rescinding a Recommendation Ralph: Text in the current process says that there is a publication of a rescinded Re[c] announced that encourages the Team to update the status of the thing that was rescinded ... to note this is no longer a Rec ... in my reading, there is no language in the current proposal to suggest the Team should update a W3C Rec is rescinded chaals: I agree, and there should be; obvious oversight. Ralph: The current process doesn't suggest how it should be done, just that it should be done ... The current proposal doesn't even have a suggestion SteveZ: Accepted chaals: WFM Ralph: I'll provide specific language, if you wish. ... Do you need to see specific language? [no] ]] > > cheers > > Chaals >
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2014 12:44:11 UTC