- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:54:46 -0600
- To: "Charles McCathie Nevile" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Cc: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
On Feb 14, 2014, at 3:50 PM, "Charles McCathie Nevile" <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > In which I confirm that I have now looked over the outstanding comment in this mail, viz. > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:41:15 +0100, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: > >> - Four separate sections of the document talk about Notes: 7.1 (2 >> paragraphs), 7.1.2 (1 paragraph), 7.3.3 (1 paragraph), and 7.8 (a >> few more paragraphs). I believe you can consolidate all this text >> and remove some of the redundancy. I am happy to propose concrete >> edits if you think that would be useful. > > Most of the trimming happened in 7.1.2 (maturity levels). I don't think consolidating everything makes sense - the relevatnt sections describe how notes fit into > - the overall development process > - the different types of Technical Reports published > - what happens when work is abandoned, and > - a section describing what has to be done to make a Note (not much) and what can be a Note (most things). > > Moving the first three sections into the fourth would be inconsistent with the general structure of the document - and vice versa. > > If you think this should be further addressed, please raise an issue. If I find time I will propose a concrete revision that eliminates redundancies. Ian > > cheers > > chaals > > -- > Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex > chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com > -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Friday, 14 February 2014 21:54:48 UTC