W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > February 2014

Re: w3process-ISSUE-85 (editorial changes): Make editorial changes a may or should? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 22:53:00 +0100
To: public-w3process@w3.org, "Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Cc: "Jeff Jaffe" <jeff@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.xbakemmfy3oazb@chaals.local>
On Fri, 07 Feb 2014 18:35:41 +0100, Revising W3C Process Community Group  
Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

> w3process-ISSUE-85 (editorial changes): Make editorial changes a may or  
> should? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
>
> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/85
>
> Raised by: Jeff Jaffe
> On product: Document life cycle (ch 7)
>
> Jeff raised this in private email.
>
> As he notes, "the community appreciates information about minor changes"  
> isn't really in the general spirit of the document setting requirements.  
> We could instead make a may or should requirement that editorial changes  
> be noted.

I will split this into a new SHOULD requirement in the next draft.

cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 14 February 2014 21:53:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:51:17 UTC