W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2014

Re: Limiting Charter extensions

From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 17:56:45 -0500
Message-ID: <5497502D.6030106@w3.org>
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, public-w3process@w3.org

On 12/21/2014 12:36 PM, Daniel Glazman wrote:
> It takes a long time because it's complex, there are a lot of documents
> involved in the AC review, the constraints on rechartering are not
> light, and I also said multiple times that time expectations for
> deliverables are, in my personal opinion, totally stupid. They take
> a lot, REALLY a lot, FAR TOO MUCH time to discuss and agree. And I
> don't even mention the fact they're usually not realistic. They are
> counter-productive and, let me repeat it, pointless. Remove them and
> we can recharter in two weeks. Remove the prioritization too for the
> same reason. Prioritization is NOT in the hands of the WG, it's in
> the hands of the implementors because we rely on their tests and on
> the two implementations we need for REC. 

If prioritization is in the hands of the implementers, why not use the 
re-chartering exercise as an opportunity to have a focused discussion 
with the implementers what the priorities are?

It seems you would need that anyways, because otherwise the WG will not 
be working on the relevant priorities.
Received on Sunday, 21 December 2014 22:56:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:51:25 UTC