W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2014

Re: Invited expert agreement

From: <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 13:46:47 +0300
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Message-Id: <33661418986007@webcorp02f.yandex-team.ru>
+ rigo@
- singer@, jeff@

Hi Sam,

I am seriously uncomfortable with a document that looks for all the world like the real thing, with no clues that it is a modified version, being put out there in public. Putting up text for discussion seems reasonable, but this page as published on your site does not. I'm hoping that you will change it to be clear that it is a proposal, before taking the discussion much further afield.



18.12.2014, 14:10, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>:
> šOn 12/18/2014 05:49 AM, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote:

>> ššAlthough I claim there is no grey in my beard - and that funny lighting makes it seem there may be - I have found that is a more effective way to move things forward than waiting for someone else to do the drafting.
> šFair enough:
> šhttp://intertwingly.net/stories/2014/12/18/08-invited-expert.html
> šThe one change is the removal of a single paragraph in section 2.2.
> šI hereby invite comments.

It would be helpful if this looked like a proposal, instead of like the actual agreement. I.e. strip out the W3C branding and write a note at the top that says it is a proposal. (You might also want to note the paragraph you stripped out).

Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 19 December 2014 10:47:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:51:25 UTC