- From: <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 13:03:11 +0300
- To: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
12.12.2014, 23:37, "Wayne Carr" <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>: > On 2014-12-12 12:23, Sam Ruby wrote: >> šWith a proportional voting system coupled with every seat being up for >> šelection each year means that any influence a company could attempt to >> šget would be temporary at best. > > With so small a group, every seat up every year does sound good. I don't > think we need to worry about continuity - that may not always be good. I actually like the continuity and think it is valuable. As Dan pointed out, losing people from the TAG can disrupt the flow of work, and having some "institutional memory" is valuable. Likewise, as far as I know Tim is chair of the TAG in name only - 2 of his 3 appointees are there as chair, and I think that role is pretty important to most groups, including the TAG. In my own experience on the AB, in principle people could read the mailing list and minutes for the last few years to find out what had already been discussed before they joined, but it seems rare that it actually happens, resulting in revisiting things that don't need to be rehashed (as well as revisiting questions that are due to be revisited - it isn't as if the answers to questions that were given from 5-10 years ago should never be re-opened). cheers Chaals > I also agree with the list of improvements Chaal's suggested. >>> š/olle >> š- Sam Ruby >> >> š[1] >> šhttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Dec/att-0038/00-part -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Sunday, 14 December 2014 10:03:49 UTC