W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2014

RE: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules; Respond by December 8, 2014

From: Léonie Watson <lwatson@paciellogroup.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 14:41:33 -0000
To: <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "'Wayne Carr'" <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>, <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002801d017ac$102ca740$3085f5c0$@paciellogroup.com>
Chaals wrote:
"In my own experience on the AB, in principle people could read the mailing
list and minutes for the last few years to find out what had already been
discussed before they joined, but it seems rare that it actually happens,
resulting in revisiting things that don't need to be rehashed (as well as
revisiting questions that are due to be revisited - it isn't as if the
answers to questions that were given from 5-10 years ago should never be
re-opened)."

I can't speak for TAG specifically, but generally with these things it's
helpful to have some work-mode continuity too. Otherwise there tends to be a
period with minimal productivity whilst the new group figures out its
approach. It's difficult to discover how things are done just by reading
minutes/mailing lists, no matter how diligent someone is.

Léonie.

-- 
Senior Accessibility Engineer, TPG
@LeonieWatson @PacielloGroup
Received on Sunday, 14 December 2014 14:41:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:51:25 UTC