- From: Léonie Watson <lwatson@paciellogroup.com>
- Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 14:41:33 -0000
- To: <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "'Wayne Carr'" <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>, <public-w3process@w3.org>
Chaals wrote: "In my own experience on the AB, in principle people could read the mailing list and minutes for the last few years to find out what had already been discussed before they joined, but it seems rare that it actually happens, resulting in revisiting things that don't need to be rehashed (as well as revisiting questions that are due to be revisited - it isn't as if the answers to questions that were given from 5-10 years ago should never be re-opened)." I can't speak for TAG specifically, but generally with these things it's helpful to have some work-mode continuity too. Otherwise there tends to be a period with minimal productivity whilst the new group figures out its approach. It's difficult to discover how things are done just by reading minutes/mailing lists, no matter how diligent someone is. Léonie. -- Senior Accessibility Engineer, TPG @LeonieWatson @PacielloGroup
Received on Sunday, 14 December 2014 14:41:58 UTC