- From: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:36:58 -0800
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 2014-12-12 12:23, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 12/12/2014 12:37 PM, Olle Olsson wrote: >> >> Anyway, /post factum/, "I can live with the proposal" -- if I still >> remember what it was ;-) >> The phrase is, I believe, "I agree". > > To be clear, I don't agree with Dan's proposal, but I can live with it. > > By contrast, I do agree with what Chaals has outlined[1]. There are > even a few ways I would go further. > > At the ASF, all board seats are up for reelection each year. There are > no seats reserved for nomination by the Directors. Any stakeholder in > the ASF can nominate themselves or as many people as they like. The > ASF uses the term "Member" for stakeholder, the closest equivalent at > the W3C would at a minimum include all chairs. We also use a > proportional voting system, like Chaals has advocated. > > With a proportional voting system coupled with every seat being up for > election each year means that any influence a company could attempt to > get would be temporary at best. With so small a group, every seat up every year does sound good. I don't think we need to worry about continuity - that may not always be good. I also agree with the list of improvements Chaal's suggested. > >> /olle > > - Sam Ruby > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Dec/att-0038/00-part > > >
Received on Friday, 12 December 2014 20:37:27 UTC