- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:23:34 -0500
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 12/12/2014 12:37 PM, Olle Olsson wrote: > > Anyway, /post factum/, "I can live with the proposal" -- if I still > remember what it was ;-) > The phrase is, I believe, "I agree". To be clear, I don't agree with Dan's proposal, but I can live with it. By contrast, I do agree with what Chaals has outlined[1]. There are even a few ways I would go further. At the ASF, all board seats are up for reelection each year. There are no seats reserved for nomination by the Directors. Any stakeholder in the ASF can nominate themselves or as many people as they like. The ASF uses the term "Member" for stakeholder, the closest equivalent at the W3C would at a minimum include all chairs. We also use a proportional voting system, like Chaals has advocated. With a proportional voting system coupled with every seat being up for election each year means that any influence a company could attempt to get would be temporary at best. > /olle - Sam Ruby [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Dec/att-0038/00-part
Received on Friday, 12 December 2014 20:24:01 UTC