w3process-ISSUE-68 (Ch7-DogFood-The-New-CR): Rather than implement it across-the-board, perhaps it would be useful to have a "candidate" period [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

w3process-ISSUE-68 (Ch7-DogFood-The-New-CR): Rather than implement it across-the-board, perhaps it would be useful to have a "candidate"  period [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/68

Raised by: Arthur Barstow
On product: Document life cycle (ch 7)

See:

[[
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2013Nov/0068.html>

Assuming the proposal moves forward, rather than implement it 
across-the-board, perhaps it would be useful to have a "candidate" 
period to work out the kinks. It might also be useful to limit the trial 
to a small set of WGs that agree to test the proposal.
]]

Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2013 15:33:52 UTC