- From: Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:30:42 +0000
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
w3process-ISSUE-66 (Ch7-Please-Dont-Create-New-Problems): Elimination of LC or combining LC and CR creates new problems [Document life cycle (ch 7)] http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/66 Raised by: Arthur Barstow On product: Document life cycle (ch 7) See: [[ <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2013Nov/0068.html> * In practice, I don't think the elimination of LC or combining LC and CR [depending on how one spins the gist of the proposal] provides a significant improvement, and as I stated last June, it appears to just create a bunch of new issues. F.ex. it appears a new process will be needed re "what is Wide Review, how are Reviews done, who is responsible for doing what" (which, IMHO is precisely the point of LC as defined in Process-20051022). ]]
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2013 15:30:47 UTC