Re: w3process-ISSUE-79: Don't require republication after 6 months of no publication

On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 20:09:18 +0400, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:

>
> On Dec 13, 2013, at 9:58 AM, "Charles McCathie Nevile"  
> <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 08:59:00 +0400, Revising W3C Process Community  
>> Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>> w3process-ISSUE-79: Don't require republication after 6 months of no  
>>> publication
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/79
>>>
>
> [snip]
>
>>> But if the group has some reason for NOT publishing, it makes no sense  
>>> to require them to publish. Clearly just adding 2 sentences of status  
>>> update will be useful and sufficient.
>>
>> Sure. If there is a way to do that (adding a new date), it is  
>> Publishing, no?
>
> Yes; people just send a request to the Webmaster to update the status.

Excellent!

By the way, there is no proposal to change this requirement from SHOULD to  
MUST. Also having it be so easy is good news.

So I don't think there is any remaining disagreement.

cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 10:53:21 UTC