- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 07:50:22 -0600
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
On Dec 6, 2013, at 7:43 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: > On 12/6/13 8:41 AM, ext Ian Jacobs wrote: >> On Dec 6, 2013, at 7:35 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: >> >>> On 12/6/13 8:34 AM, ext Ian Jacobs wrote: >>>> On Dec 6, 2013, at 7:24 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Come to think about it, I have a strong preference to use <https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/> for all process-related bug and issue tracking including publication rules. Please do NOT bury this Issue in particular in Member-confidential space. >>>> A new space would be public. But this is still not the right forum. >> Responsibility for pubrules lies with the comm team, not this group. > > Well that's certainly a bug. > > AB Priority+ take on Pub Rules and make sure related discussions are done in a Public forum I didn't say the discussions couldn't happen in public. Some do (e.g., spec-prod) and more can. I said that the comm team has responsibility, not this CG. Ian -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 13:50:24 UTC