- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 08:43:53 -0500
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- CC: Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 12/6/13 8:41 AM, ext Ian Jacobs wrote: > On Dec 6, 2013, at 7:35 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: > >> On 12/6/13 8:34 AM, ext Ian Jacobs wrote: >>> On Dec 6, 2013, at 7:24 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Come to think about it, I have a strong preference to use <https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/> for all process-related bug and issue tracking including publication rules. Please do NOT bury this Issue in particular in Member-confidential space. >>> A new space would be public. But this is still not the right forum. > Responsibility for pubrules lies with the comm team, not this group. Well that's certainly a bug. AB Priority+ take on Pub Rules and make sure related discussions are done in a Public forum.
Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 13:49:33 UTC