Re: Legislative types in schema.org

Great extension proposal! let's move this discussion to there
<https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1156>.
Thanks Thomas, great work.

2016-09-13 4:22 GMT-03:00 Thomas Francart <thomas.francart@sparna.fr>:

> Hello
>
> There was a proposal for a "legal" extension of schema.org raised a few
> months ago in Github : https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1156
> The extension introduces the generic type "Legislation", but does not
> refine it into subtypes; if focuses more on the descriptive properties and
> links to describe a piece of legislation published on a legislative portal.
> We are currently refining the extension to adress the comments received so
> far (mostly to reuse more properties from the latest SDO 3.1).
>
> Best Regards
> Thomas
>
> 2016-09-12 20:43 GMT+02:00 Peter Krauss <ppkrauss@gmail.com>:
>
>> The Diane's link to documentation have other good start point (!),
>>    https://blog.law.cornell.edu/metasausage/files/downloads/20
>> 13/02/legis-test3.png  (spreadsheet
>> <https://blog.law.cornell.edu/metasausage/wp-content/plugins/download-monitor/download.php?id=15>
>> )
>> *legis:Document* is the concept for "Legislation and regulation"
>> Document concept of Akoma-Ntoso standard.
>>
>> Note, about types and subtypes... A good approach is to preserve original
>> taxonomy as part in the document's identification,
>> as LEX URNs <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lex_(URN)> (draft RFC
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-spinosa-urn-lex/> shows the
>> hierarchy of jurisdiction / authority / measure-type).
>>
>>
>> 2016-09-12 14:38 GMT-03:00 Diane Hillmann <metadata.maven@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Folks:
>>>
>>> You might want to take a look at the US Legislative Information Model,
>>> developed by the Cornell Legal Information Institute and Metadata
>>> Management Associates under contract with the Library of Congress:
>>>
>>> http://metadataregistry.org/schema/show/id/69.html
>>>
>>> And the documentation:
>>>
>>> https://blog.law.cornell.edu/metasausage/downloads-and-relat
>>> ed-information/
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Diane Hillmann
>>> Metadata Management Associates LLC
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looks like Roger from LexisNexus (Reed Elsevier) had his hand in
>>>> forming some of this.  (a good thing)
>>>>
>>>> I really like the description on this Type, for example :
>>>>
>>>> *Akoma Ntoso*
>>>>
>>>> *Document Types*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Category /Legal Document*
>>>>
>>>> *Definition*
>>>>
>>>> bill/act
>>>>
>>>> *Akoma Ntoso type :*
>>>>
>>>> hierarchicalStructure
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Legal Document:*
>>>>
>>>> bill/act/ordinance/decree/subsidiary legislation/executive orders/
>>>> normative standard/ administrative regulation/etc.
>>>>
>>>> These are deliberative documents produced by parliamentary activities
>>>> or from other empowered bodies (e.g. Committee). They are usually drawn up
>>>> according to a hierarchical structure in which the text is subdivided into
>>>> sections or chapters. These are subdivided into clauses or articles,
>>>> sub-paragraphs, etc.
>>>>
>>>> ​Chapter 2 of the Oasis draft says it all however.  Very well thought
>>>> out.  (especially 2.2 and 2.3 and 4.2.3 and 6.6 )
>>>>
>>>> Its a good base to start things from.
>>>>
>>>> Thad
>>>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> *Thomas Francart* -* SPARNA*
> Web de *données* | Architecture de l'*information* | Accès aux
> *connaissances*
> blog : blog.sparna.fr, site : sparna.fr, linkedin : fr.linkedin.com/in/
> thomasfrancart
> tel :  +33 (0)6.71.11.25.97, skype : francartthomas
>