- From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 13:01:05 +0100
- To: Jim Goodell <jimgoodell@qi-partners.com>
- Cc: paoladimaio10@googlemail.com, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAD47Kz5hMips2oS1Yg1KquxsGg0G1qfEKM+-7RBavksxuS5Fxw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, Sounds like an interesting use case. I share your concern about the use of Emergency as currently it is defined as an enumeration value for a type of MedicalSpecialty. What you describe is more related to an emergency event. However as Jim points out, Landform is probably a good area to start for defining a Sinkhole type. Following your thinking it feels like there might be a need for a geological/natural event type which could be linked to associated LandForm types so that events like the appearance of a sinkhole, volcanic eruption, tsunami, meteor strike, etc. could be described. As to working with Schema, there will be improved documentation in the next [imminent] release. You can preview here: http://webschemas.org/docs/howwework.html I would also point you at a 3 part blog post series I produced [1 <http://dataliberate.com/2016/02/10/evolving-schema-org-in-practice-pt1-the-bits-and-pieces/> ,2 <http://dataliberate.com/2016/02/25/evolving-schema-org-in-practice-pt2-working-within-the-vocabulary/> ,3 <http://dataliberate.com/2016/03/01/evolving-schema-org-in-practice-pt3-choosing-where-to-extend/> ] ~Richard Richard Wallis Founder, Data Liberate http://dataliberate.com Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis Twitter: @rjw On 3 May 2016 at 12:44, Jim Goodell <jimgoodell@qi-partners.com> wrote: > PDM, > I don’t claim to have any knowledge of this area, but would think Thing > <https://schema.org/Thing> > Place <https://schema.org/Place> > Landform > <https://schema.org/Landform> is the appropriate schema.org type for > sinkholes. > jim > > From: <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> on behalf of Paola Di Maio < > paola.dimaio@gmail.com> > Reply-To: <paoladimaio10@googlemail.com> > Date: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 at 7:30 AM > To: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org> > Subject: sinkholes schema > Resent-From: <public-vocabs@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 11:31:21 +0000 > > Greetings > > I am working on two versions of an online map of sinkholes autogenerated > by RSS feeds from news alerts > > The most advanced version of the system would extract certain data from > the feed (location, size, depth, cause etc), It came to mind that it would > be useful to have a sinkhole data schema to start with > > Checked the schema.org <http://schema..org> and found 'emergency' which > could (or could not) be a top level category for sinkholes > > However, noted that emergency in schema.org is classified as a medical > event. That would not do > > So, I wonder if others see the need to bump up 'emergency' to be a broad > term for various types of emergency (medical being one of them) and if > this makes sense in this project, and how to do that? > https://schema.org/Emergency > > alternatively, I could propose a different type of top level term > such as 'geological occurrance' and stick the sinkhole uner that, but > would that make sense? > > > secondly, have not yet found out how to create a new schema > (browsed the documentation but there is no entry on > how to start a new schema). have I just not seen it? > https://schema.org/docs/faq.html > > > pointers welcome > thankz > > PDM > > >
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2016 12:01:35 UTC