- From: Jim Goodell <jimgoodell@qi-partners.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 07:44:45 -0400
- To: <paoladimaio10@googlemail.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <D34E0635.C9535%jimgoodell@qi-partners.com>
PDM, I donšt claim to have any knowledge of this area, but would think Thing <https://schema.org/Thing> > Place <https://schema.org/Place> > Landform <https://schema.org/Landform> is the appropriate schema.org type for sinkholes. jim From: <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> on behalf of Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> Reply-To: <paoladimaio10@googlemail.com> Date: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 at 7:30 AM To: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org> Subject: sinkholes schema Resent-From: <public-vocabs@w3.org> Resent-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 11:31:21 +0000 Greetings I am working on two versions of an online map of sinkholes autogenerated by RSS feeds from news alerts The most advanced version of the system would extract certain data from the feed (location, size, depth, cause etc), It came to mind that it would be useful to have a sinkhole data schema to start with Checked the schema.org <http://schema.org> and found 'emergency' which could (or could not) be a top level category for sinkholes However, noted that emergency in schema.org <http://schema.org> is classified as a medical event. That would not do So, I wonder if others see the need to bump up 'emergency' to be a broad term for various types of emergency (medical being one of them) and if this makes sense in this project, and how to do that? https://schema.org/Emergency alternatively, I could propose a different type of top level term such as 'geological occurrance' and stick the sinkhole uner that, but would that make sense? secondly, have not yet found out how to create a new schema (browsed the documentation but there is no entry on how to start a new schema). have I just not seen it? https://schema.org/docs/faq.html pointers welcome thankz PDM
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2016 11:46:52 UTC