- From: Niels Andersen <niels@thinkiq.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:47:47 +0000
- To: "mfhepp@gmail.com" <mfhepp@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <820ABCE535B8CE38.3-c31f654e-d272-4c4d-9e1a-a05448375cc9@mail.outlook.com>
Thank you for the quick response. I also found that TopQuadrant have published an OWL version of schema.org in til and rdf format. Best regards, Niels Sent from Outlook Mobile<https://aka.ms/blhgte> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 1:34 AM -0700, "Martin Hepp" <mfhepp@gmail.com<mailto:mfhepp@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear Niels: > http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html is RDF in the form of RDFa embedded in HTML. While there may be ontology editors that can't handle RDFa, it is a perfectly valid RDF syntax. You can use the tool http://rdf-translator.appspot.com/ to convert this into any other popular RDF syntax, namely RDF/XML or Turtle. But please use the service selectively; it runs on free quota on appspot.com and might have to cease its operation if we run over quota. Note that schema.org uses a proprietary pattern for domain and range modeling. Best Martin ----------------------------------- martin hepp http://www.heppnetz.de mhepp@computer.org @mfhepp > On 10 Apr 2016, at 09:35, Niels Andersen <niels@thinkiq.com> wrote: > > I am trying to use schema.org together with RDF, but I cannot find out how to download the file. > > The closest thing that I have found is http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html , which does not appear to be an rdf file. > > There is an owl file, which fails to load in Protégé, TopBraid and Jena. The comment in the file says that it is out of date an likely not very useful. > > Please provide guidance to where I can find this information. > > Niels
Received on Sunday, 10 April 2016 08:48:19 UTC