Re: Sustainable Codes vs Volatile URIs Re: URIs / Ontology for Physical Units and Quantities

Simon,

2015-05-08 0:36 GMT-03:00 <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>:

> Phil -
>
> I took a look through the Community Groups, and found
>     https://www.w3.org/community/perma-id/#
> which it appears you are/were involved in. AFAICT the outcome of that work
> is
>     http://w3id.org/
> which hosts redirects, and is intended to do this indefinitely. So anyone
> who has a resource-set (including a list of definitions) for which they
> would like a neutral/persistent baseURI, can request a directory (by
> issuing a pull-request), and hope it is approved by the administrators.
> Have I got it?
>
>
Thanks!
You find a good initiative/community that (looks to) fit with the "URN as
code" for SchemaOrg demands...
Only to confirm: the suggestion is to use w3id.org as baseURI of URNs and
URN-Resolvers?



> Schema.org already has a small presence.
>
>
If SchemaOrg evolves in this direction, what the strategy?
Perhaps we need first to do some homework ;-)
(I am starting to do mine here <https://github.com/ppKrauss/standard-URNs>)




> The technology is rather trivial - it is the intention which matters.
>

yes


> But it looks like a lighter-weight alternative to http://w3.org/ns -
> though governance is currently rather informal.
>
>
yes, better alternative...
Perhaps with SchemaOrg participation, some curatory aspects can be
formalized.

PPKrauss

Received on Saturday, 9 May 2015 22:01:36 UTC