- From: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:47:04 +0200
- To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 30 March 2015 08:47:47 UTC
Hello, > Le 30 mars 2015 à 10:31, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> a écrit : > > In Social WG we currently only use JSON-LD as normative serialization. I > just suggested that instead of defining tons of inverse properties Why do you think is a problem to define *tones* of inverse properties in vocabularies? BTW, a vocabulary doesn't usually have *tons* of terms ;) > in > vocabulary(ies), we can simply define aliases for them in JSON-LD context. > http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#reverse-properties <http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#reverse-properties>Hum.. Not sure why do you want to make a vocabulary JSON-LD dependent., that is RDF serialization dependent. My 1 cent .. Best, Ghislain
Received on Monday, 30 March 2015 08:47:47 UTC