- From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:49:05 +0200
- To: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAK4ZFVE8k=ua3pMU3wskcOD73gW9g5FB6cyCqwTm3yZ3bHqe=g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all I'm wondering about http://schema.org/status being used only on http://schema.org/MedicalStudy This property "status" has various definitions (if any) in various vocabularies. see http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/terms?q=status People often take for granted that there is a "status" property in Dublin Core, and put a dcterms:status in their metadata without double checkng - but there is none. foaf:status has the very specific definition of user status, mood etc dbpedia-owl:status does not give any definition ... bibo:status seems the most reasonable basis for extending the semantics of schema:status (but bibo does not eat completely its dog food, using vs:term_status internally) Proposal : add schema:status to schema:CreativeWork description, and change its definition to a more general one along the one of bibo. Note that this will not solve the issue of various meanings of "status" in Biology see http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/terms?q=status&tag=Biology That's what you get with a unique namespace policy :) -- *Bernard Vatant* Vocabularies & Data Engineering Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59 Skype : bernard.vatant http://google.com/+BernardVatant -------------------------------------------------------- *Mondeca* 35 boulevard de Strasbourg 75010 Paris www.mondeca.com Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews> ----------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 30 March 2015 09:49:54 UTC