Re: Proposal for Schema.org extension mechanism

I agree that we do have to look out for this.

I trust you will all keep us honest and make sure that what needs to go
into the core does go into the core.

guha

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote:

> Hi Guha,
>
> > On Mar 19, 2015, at 7:36 PM, Guha <guha@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > We would like to proceed with the implementation of this proposal. If
> there are strong objections, now would be the right time to raise them.
>
> I’m still not convinced that the middle category (reviewed vocabularies)
> will be good for schema.org and web publishers. I am concerned that it
> will mean less work is done to integrate extensions into the core, and
> schema.org will become difficult to navigate and understand as a whole.
>
> Luckily you don’t need to convince me to proceed with your plan :-)
>
> //Ed
>