W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > January 2015

Re: A versioning model for schema.org

From: John Walker <john.walker@semaku.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 23:16:29 +0100 (CET)
To: Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com>, jean-delahousse <delahousse.jean@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <776217626.40845.1422569789016.open-xchange@oxweb01.eigbox.net>
Here's another:
http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Community:Versioning_and_URIs

And the start of a short mail exchange over on public LOD list:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2014Jul/0103.html

John


> On January 29, 2015 at 9:55 PM jean-delahousse <delahousse.jean@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>  Thanks for all those useful resources
>  Jean
>  Le jeu. 29 janv. 2015 à 19:44, Wes Turner < wes.turner@gmail.com
> <mailto:wes.turner@gmail.com> > a écrit :
>    > >    On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:03 AM, jean-delahousse
>    > > <delahousse.jean@gmail.com <mailto:delahousse.jean@gmail.com> > wrote:
> >      > > >      Thoughts:
> > > 
> > >      PROV(enance) ontology could be very useful to describe the changes
> > > and link them to  related "issues" as well as formal decision which
> > > validate the change.
> > >    > > 
> >    In terms of linking between versions of the schema, these W3C PROV
> > predicates may be useful:
> > 
> >    *  http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-primer/
> > 
> >         > > >         prov:wasRevisionOf
> > >         prov:wasDerivedFrom
> > >         prov:wasRevisionOf
> > > 
> > >    > > From OWL and dcterms:
> > 
> >         > > >         owl:versionIRI
> > >         owl:priorVersion
> > >         dc:isVersionOf
> > >    > >         > > > 
> > >    > >    From XKOS (for more granular relations between (versions of)
> > >    > > vocabularies):
> > 
> >    *  https://github.com/linked-statistics/xkos/blob/master/xkos.ttl
> >    *  http://www.ddialliance.org/Specification/RDF/XKOS
> > 
> >         > > >         xkos:supersedes
> > >         xkos:precedes
> > >         xkos:succeeds
> > >         [...]
> > > 
> > >    > > There's likely some insight here:
> > >    > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2014237/what-are-the-best-practices-for-versioning-xml-schemas
> > 
> >    It may be helpful to ask a question here:
> >  http://answers.semanticweb.com/
> > 
> >    *
> >  http://answers.semanticweb.com/search/?q=versioning&Submit=search&t=question
> > <http://answers.semanticweb.com/search/?q=versioning&Submit=search&t=question>
> >    *
> >  http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/453/how-to-implement-semantic-data-versioning
> >    *
> >  http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/2815/how-do-i-knowmodel-the-applied-version-of-an-ontology-specification
> >    *
> >  http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/3499/ontology-version-control-systems
> >    *
> >  http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/3677/what-provenance-vocabulary-should-we-use
> > (2011)
> > 
> >    The Talis Changeset vocabulary does seem very approachable:
> > 
> >    *  http://vocab.org/changeset/schema.html
> > 
> >      > > > 
> > >      Best regards
> > > 
> > >    > >  > 
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2015 22:16:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 January 2015 22:16:58 UTC