Re: Some interesting things that show up when using a reasoner to classify schema.org

I just opened an issue for this:

https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/255

--------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen

e-mail:  martin.hepp@unibw.de
phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www:     http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
         http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype:   mfhepp 
twitter: mfhepp





On 21 Jan 2015, at 17:21, Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@unibw.de> wrote:

> Hi Dan,
> A hands-on solution would be to add two internal "annotation" properties "rangeHint" and "domainHint" that allow explicitly triggering the display of certain schema.org types in the documentation.
> 
> 
>    <div typeof="rdf:Property" resource="http://schema.org/purpose">
> ...
>      <span>Range: <a property="http://schema.org/rangeHint" href="http://schema.org/MedicalDevicePurpose">MedicalDevicePurpose</a></span>
>      <span>Range: <a property="http://schema.org/rangeIncludes" href="http://schema.org/Thing">Thing</a></span>
>    </div>
> 
> 
> The documentation could then list the formal range (Thing) and popular types for the range (e.g. MedicalDevicePurpose)
> 
> This requires just ten lines in the RDFa and tweaking the Python code and Jinja templates that generate the documentation.
> 
> Martin
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------
> martin hepp
> e-business & web science research group
> universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
> 
> e-mail:  martin.hepp@unibw.de
> phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
> fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
> www:     http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
>         http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
> skype:   mfhepp 
> twitter: mfhepp
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 19 Jan 2015, at 18:18, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Simon,
>> 
>> Thanks for these! I've opened Github issues for most of them, though I
>> take your point that there are more out there.
>> 
>> On 18 January 2015 at 17:54, Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 1:  The range of schema:purpose has no purpose.
>>>    MedicalDevicePurpose OR Thing  = Thing
>> 
>> https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/233
>> 
>>> 2: The range for schema:trailer includes MovieGameSeries
>> 
>> https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/234
>> 
>>> 3: schema:musicBy has a much smaller domain than actor or director
>> 
>> https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/235
>> 
>>> 4: The range of foodEstablishment is  FoodEstablishment or Place;
>>> but: FoodEstablishment is a subclass of LocalBusiness
>>>        LocalBusiness is a subclass of Place,
>> 
>> On this one I'm more sympathetic to Martin Hepp's point. Many local
>> businesses have foody aspects to them but it isn't always feasible to
>> make that explicit. However I'm wary of slipping into using
>> rangeIncludes and domainIncludes assertions purely as a UI
>> configuration language  for the Web site.
>> 
>>> Lots, lots more.
>> 
>> Feel free to fwd or bug-file the entire horror!
>> 
>> We have some very basic unit tests expressed in SPARQL -
>> https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/blob/master/tests/test_graphs.py#L97
>> etc. which ought to catch more of these (e.g. mentions of types that
>> don't have definitions should help avoid types). This currently
>> requires Python RDFLib for the SPARQL tests, and I have had no success
>> making SPARQL 1.1 property paths work as advertised, which I hoped
>> might allow some basic matching against hierarchy.
>> 
>> cheers,
>> 
>> Dan
>> 
>>> + The number of children (and adults) for which a Lodging reservations can be made can be a floating point number.
>> https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/232
>> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 16:25:39 UTC