W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > February 2015

Re: JSON-LD onsite examples: are @context values missing a trailing slash?

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:05:18 -0500
Message-ID: <54E6500E.8090102@openlinksw.com>
To: public-vocabs@w3.org
On 2/19/15 3:32 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
> On 19 February 2015 at 20:25, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
>
>> As Kingsley points out, though <http://schema.org> and <http://schema.org/> are two different resources in the strict RDF sense.
> RDF does not make a unique names assumption; different URIs can be
> names for the same real world entity.

That's true. But "Dan", "Dan Brickley", @danbri etc.. are literal 
identifiers that all have a common referent, in our so-called "real 
world" medium. Thus, I would encourage anyone publishing a document 
about you to use the most unambiguous identifier, in relation to the 
medium of communication.

Remember, there was once a time when middle names (or at least middle 
initials) were really important when referring to People, in our 
so-called "real world" :)

>
> Per http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf11-concepts-20140225/#resources-and-statements
>   "Any IRI or literal denotes something in the world (the "universe of
> discourse"). These things are called resources. Anything can be a
> resource, including physical things, documents, abstract concepts,
> numbers and strings; the term is synonymous with "entity" as it is
> used in the RDF Semantics specification".
>
> When we introduced the WebSite type for schema.org I considered
> exploiting this very slim distinction between <http://example.com> and
> <http://example.com/> (the former being a WebSite, the latter being a
> different entity, its home page, a WebPage). But the distinction is
> too slippery and undeployable in practice for a number of reasons.
>
> All this nitpicking aside I do see value in nudging schema.org
> examples towards using http://schema.org/ with the trailing slash, for
> consistency with the RDFa vocab declaration.

I struggle with your "nitpicking" characterization. This isn't about 
nitpicking, it is all about giving folks appropriate guidance so that 
they can operate in this Web medium effectively.

None of us where taught at school to refer to things unambiguously. Why 
take that approach on the Web? Just because the medium is digital i.e., 
different from our so-called "real world" ?

>
> Dan
>
>


-- 
Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com
Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this



Received on Thursday, 19 February 2015 21:05:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:49:39 UTC