- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:05:18 -0500
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <54E6500E.8090102@openlinksw.com>
On 2/19/15 3:32 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: > On 19 February 2015 at 20:25, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > >> As Kingsley points out, though <http://schema.org> and <http://schema.org/> are two different resources in the strict RDF sense. > RDF does not make a unique names assumption; different URIs can be > names for the same real world entity. That's true. But "Dan", "Dan Brickley", @danbri etc.. are literal identifiers that all have a common referent, in our so-called "real world" medium. Thus, I would encourage anyone publishing a document about you to use the most unambiguous identifier, in relation to the medium of communication. Remember, there was once a time when middle names (or at least middle initials) were really important when referring to People, in our so-called "real world" :) > > Per http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf11-concepts-20140225/#resources-and-statements > "Any IRI or literal denotes something in the world (the "universe of > discourse"). These things are called resources. Anything can be a > resource, including physical things, documents, abstract concepts, > numbers and strings; the term is synonymous with "entity" as it is > used in the RDF Semantics specification". > > When we introduced the WebSite type for schema.org I considered > exploiting this very slim distinction between <http://example.com> and > <http://example.com/> (the former being a WebSite, the latter being a > different entity, its home page, a WebPage). But the distinction is > too slippery and undeployable in practice for a number of reasons. > > All this nitpicking aside I do see value in nudging schema.org > examples towards using http://schema.org/ with the trailing slash, for > consistency with the RDFa vocab declaration. I struggle with your "nitpicking" characterization. This isn't about nitpicking, it is all about giving folks appropriate guidance so that they can operate in this Web medium effectively. None of us where taught at school to refer to things unambiguously. Why take that approach on the Web? Just because the medium is digital i.e., different from our so-called "real world" ? > > Dan > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2015 21:05:41 UTC