Re: New schema.org release candiate for review (sdo-stantz)

+1 
Best wishes / Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Martin Hepp

-------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen

e-mail:  martin.hepp@unibw.de
phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www:     http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
         http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype:   mfhepp 
twitter: mfhepp

Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
=================================================================
* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/




On 30 Jan 2015, at 21:47, Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com> wrote:

> The #examples deep links work great, thanks!
> 
> E.g. http://sdo-stantz.appspot.com/MedicalGuideline#examples
> 
> On Jan 30, 2015 11:35 AM, "Dan Brickley" <danbri@google.com> wrote:
> Hmm It seems only yesterday we sent around the sdo-venkman release for review -
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014Nov/0093.html
> 
> >>> from datetime import date
> >>> then = date(2014, 11, 17)
> >>> now = date(2015, 01, 30)
> >>> (now - then).days
> 74
> 
> The followup schema.org release ("sdo-stantz") is nearly done. It
> might need a few final tweaks and polish but please take a look at the
> draft release summary at:
> 
>   http://sdo-stantz.appspot.com/docs/releases.html#sdo-stantz
> 
> If you want to jump into specific issues and changes they're all
> linked from that page to changes or issues on github. See also
> https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues
> 
> Thanks to everyone who has helped catch so many bugs and glitches.
> There are plenty more things to improve but it is time we published
> what we've got so far as progress on schema.org. We'll give it a week
> or so to polish and fix things, ... thanks for taking a look.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Dan,
> 
> for schema.org
>

Received on Monday, 2 February 2015 05:47:47 UTC