- From: <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:59:32 +0200
- To: Guha <guha@google.com>, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Cc: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>, W3C Vocabularies <public-vocabs@w3.org>
It's probably useful to plan for something on the plenary day... (although my plans for that are loading up fast so I am glad there will be others there). 22.09.2014, 17:39, "Guha" <guha@google.com>: > I will certainly come to the TPAC in Santa Clara (assuming no emergency takes me out of town, etc.). Would it make sense to have a vocabulary or schema.org related session/track? > > I would be happy to come talk to the Social WG. > > guha > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 2:59 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: >> On 09/22/2014 11:15 AM, Peter Mika wrote: >>> Hi Renato, All, >>> >>> Just like Guha, I want to start out by saying how much we appreciate >>> everyone's input and your concern for the growth of the >>> Linked/Data/Semantic Web. >>> >>> The same passion for the Web drove us to start schema.org, and from the >>> beginning we realized that yes, if we create any original text as part >>> of the schema, even if it's just a couple of words, we would own the >>> copyright to it. Exactly for this reason, we are going to great length >>> trying to 'disown' schema.org <http://schema.org/> so that publishers >>> (and really anyone else) can feel completely safe to use it and build on >>> it. The two ways of disowning that we could come up with and implemented >>> so far: >>> >>> #1 A Creative Commons copyright license >>> #2 Our commitment to the W3C Patent Policy >>> >>> The last schema.org TOS update was in fact adding #2. >>> >>> We really hope this is sufficient for everyone to freely use and build >>> upon schema.org. However, we welcome your input on what other steps we >>> could take! >> Hi Peter, >> >> We currently discuss using schema.org for our work in W3 Social Web WG >> http://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/social-wg-charter.html >> >> Face to face meeting during TPAC will most likely also include relevant >> conversation. Some of WG members voiced various concerns about building >> on top of schema.org, especially that no one representing any of >> schema.org sponsor organizations participates in Social Web WG process. >> >> I would find it super helpful if at least one of the W3C members who >> co-leads schema.org effort could joint that TPAC session. >> 27&28 October 2014, Santa Clara http://www.w3.org/2014/11/TPAC/ >> >> Thank you! >> ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Monday, 22 September 2014 16:00:05 UTC