- From: Guha <guha@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 08:36:58 -0700
- To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Cc: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>, W3C Vocabularies <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPAGhv8-P+n1z7+DiVXJWJ6yeJu1=QGK857BNfqDV7Ynv=x53Q@mail.gmail.com>
I will certainly come to the TPAC in Santa Clara (assuming no emergency takes me out of town, etc.). Would it make sense to have a vocabulary or schema.org related session/track? I would be happy to come talk to the Social WG. guha On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 2:59 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ < perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: > On 09/22/2014 11:15 AM, Peter Mika wrote: > > Hi Renato, All, > > > > Just like Guha, I want to start out by saying how much we appreciate > > everyone's input and your concern for the growth of the > > Linked/Data/Semantic Web. > > > > The same passion for the Web drove us to start schema.org, and from the > > beginning we realized that yes, if we create any original text as part > > of the schema, even if it's just a couple of words, we would own the > > copyright to it. Exactly for this reason, we are going to great length > > trying to 'disown' schema.org <http://schema.org/> so that publishers > > (and really anyone else) can feel completely safe to use it and build on > > it. The two ways of disowning that we could come up with and implemented > > so far: > > > > #1 A Creative Commons copyright license > > #2 Our commitment to the W3C Patent Policy > > > > The last schema.org TOS update was in fact adding #2. > > > > We really hope this is sufficient for everyone to freely use and build > > upon schema.org. However, we welcome your input on what other steps we > > could take! > Hi Peter, > > We currently discuss using schema.org for our work in W3 Social Web WG > http://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/social-wg-charter.html > > Face to face meeting during TPAC will most likely also include relevant > conversation. Some of WG members voiced various concerns about building > on top of schema.org, especially that no one representing any of > schema.org sponsor organizations participates in Social Web WG process. > > I would find it super helpful if at least one of the W3C members who > co-leads schema.org effort could joint that TPAC session. > 27&28 October 2014, Santa Clara http://www.w3.org/2014/11/TPAC/ > > Thank you! > ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ >
Received on Monday, 22 September 2014 15:37:25 UTC