- From: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 11:44:48 +0200
- To: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Cc: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADK2AU3gVHDgee4Y-z2rRquZCa+=KORt5SHGQdYSYmVAfRWNGg@mail.gmail.com>
> > "Which I think finds it origin in the fact that few are aware multi-type > entities can be used." Supplement: And because Google generates a Rich snippet for Product but not Service! 2014-09-19 11:35 GMT+02:00 Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>: > "Could be; I did not because offers comes from the "old" schema.org ecommerce >> model (in GR the link is from the Offer to the Product, not vice versa). >> But if this property is meant to live, it could be added to Service, too. >> " > > > So far I've been using MTEs to express a Service offers an Offer, which > works but I've always considered it a bit cumbersome. > > Next to that I've also encountered quite some sites (sorry, no URL out the > top of my head) where I saw services being marked up as a Product so > 'offers' could be used. Which I think finds it origin in the fact that few > are aware multi-type entities can be used. > > Adding 'offers' to Service maybe could help Service be used more often as > opposed to falsely using Product. > > 2014-09-19 11:22 GMT+02:00 martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org < > martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>: > > Could be; I did not because offers comes from the "old" schema.org >> ecommerce model (in GR the link is from the Offer to the Product, not vice >> versa). >> >> But if this property is meant to live, it could be added to Service, too. >> Martin >> >> >> >> >> On 18 Sep 2014, at 22:34, Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Can the one submitting the respective pull request please make sure >> that the additional rangeIncludes statements are added to chema:itemOffered >> and schema:typeOfGood? >> > >> > Shouldn't 'offers' be added to Service as well than? >> > >> > >> > >> > 2014-09-18 22:14 GMT+02:00 Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>: >> > >> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:15 AM, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org < >> martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote: >> > > and maybe while on it, for schema:itemOffered we could extend >> > > schema:rangeIncludes with Service and Role ? >> > > >> > > :) >> > > >> > >> > See above. We must do that. >> > >> > Can the one submitting the respective pull request please make sure >> that the additional rangeIncludes statements are added to chema:itemOffered >> and schema:typeOfGood? >> > >> > I'll update the proposal and circulate that before putting together a >> pull request. >> > >> > - Vicki >> > >> > Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com >> > >> > >> >> >
Received on Friday, 19 September 2014 09:45:15 UTC