- From: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 11:35:54 +0200
- To: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Cc: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADK2AU0tVBdRUfEcHX=RB378V0ROqKQrxat6hTfnWu+CM71W+Q@mail.gmail.com>
> > "Could be; I did not because offers comes from the "old" schema.org ecommerce > model (in GR the link is from the Offer to the Product, not vice versa). > But if this property is meant to live, it could be added to Service, too." So far I've been using MTEs to express a Service offers an Offer, which works but I've always considered it a bit cumbersome. Next to that I've also encountered quite some sites (sorry, no URL out the top of my head) where I saw services being marked up as a Product so 'offers' could be used. Which I think finds it origin in the fact that few are aware multi-type entities can be used. Adding 'offers' to Service maybe could help Service be used more often as opposed to falsely using Product. 2014-09-19 11:22 GMT+02:00 martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org < martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>: > Could be; I did not because offers comes from the "old" schema.org > ecommerce model (in GR the link is from the Offer to the Product, not vice > versa). > > But if this property is meant to live, it could be added to Service, too. > Martin > > > > > On 18 Sep 2014, at 22:34, Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Can the one submitting the respective pull request please make sure that > the additional rangeIncludes statements are added to chema:itemOffered and > schema:typeOfGood? > > > > Shouldn't 'offers' be added to Service as well than? > > > > > > > > 2014-09-18 22:14 GMT+02:00 Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>: > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:15 AM, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org < > martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote: > > > and maybe while on it, for schema:itemOffered we could extend > > > schema:rangeIncludes with Service and Role ? > > > > > > :) > > > > > > > See above. We must do that. > > > > Can the one submitting the respective pull request please make sure that > the additional rangeIncludes statements are added to chema:itemOffered and > schema:typeOfGood? > > > > I'll update the proposal and circulate that before putting together a > pull request. > > > > - Vicki > > > > Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 19 September 2014 09:36:21 UTC