- From: Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:16:17 +0000
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- CC: "chaals@yandex-team.ru" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, "Peter F.Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>, "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, "<public-vocabs@w3.org>" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <17ba8fdf06f64aa28cc9701767503ec4@BY2PR06MB204.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
I could live with either solution. Treating it as a class would allow for the possibility of adding properties down the road. That’s the only major difference I see.
Jeff
From: Thad Guidry [mailto:thadguidry@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:44 PM
To: Young,Jeff (OR)
Cc: chaals@yandex-team.ru; Dan Scott; Dan Brickley; Peter F.Patel-Schneider; Wallis,Richard; martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org; Karen Coyle; <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Person and fictional Re: VideoGame proposal
So this is very much like...
Richard's proposal : http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/FictionalThing
Where he does something like:
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Place">
<link itemprop="additionalType" href="http://schema.org/FictionalThing"/>
City of: <span itemprop="name">Paris</span><br/>
But Jeff, your saying to perhaps do something like:
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Place" fictional="true">
City of: <span itemprop="name">Paris</span><br/>
Yes ? No ?
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org<mailto:jyoung@oclc.org>> wrote:
If the movie and the director are both fictional, then schema:fictional=true could be assigned to both separately. The relationship between them would be schema:director (which doesn’t need to be tagged as “fictional”).
The fact that a fictional movie might happen to be schema:genre=”Science fiction” is merely a coincidence.
Jeff
From: Thad Guidry [mailto:thadguidry@gmail.com<mailto:thadguidry@gmail.com>]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:23 PM
To: Young,Jeff (OR)
Cc: chaals@yandex-team.ru<mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru>; Dan Scott; Dan Brickley; Peter F.Patel-Schneider; Wallis,Richard; martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org<mailto:martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>; Karen Coyle; <public-vocabs@w3.org<mailto:public-vocabs@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: Person and fictional Re: VideoGame proposal
Jeff... ok...
Is this...
schema:fictional false; # to be pedantic about it
A property to be used on ANY Schema.org Type ? How would it work against say...
<div itemscope itemtype ="http://schema.org/Movie">
<h1 itemprop="name">Avatar</h1>
<span>Director: <span itemprop="director">James Cameron</span> (born August 16, 1954)</span>
<span itemprop="genre">Science fiction</span>
<a href="../movies/avatar-theatrical-trailer.html" itemprop="trailer">Trailer</a>
</div>
What would the changes needed look like on the code above , if both itemtype="http://schema.org/Movie" and itemprop="director" were both Fictional ?
--
-Thad
+ThadGuidry<https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
Thad on LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org<mailto:jyoung@oclc.org>> wrote:
Here’s how I imagine splitting the hair:
_:A0
a schema:Book;
schema:name “Anna Karenina”;
schema:fictional false; # to be pedantic about it
schema:about _:A1;
schema:genre “Fiction”;
.
_:A1
a schema:Person;
schema:fictional true;
schema:name “Anna Karenina”;
.
--
-Thad
+ThadGuidry<https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
Thad on LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
Received on Monday, 20 October 2014 20:16:49 UTC