- From: Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:16:17 +0000
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- CC: "chaals@yandex-team.ru" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, "Peter F.Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>, "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, "<public-vocabs@w3.org>" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <17ba8fdf06f64aa28cc9701767503ec4@BY2PR06MB204.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
I could live with either solution. Treating it as a class would allow for the possibility of adding properties down the road. That’s the only major difference I see. Jeff From: Thad Guidry [mailto:thadguidry@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:44 PM To: Young,Jeff (OR) Cc: chaals@yandex-team.ru; Dan Scott; Dan Brickley; Peter F.Patel-Schneider; Wallis,Richard; martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org; Karen Coyle; <public-vocabs@w3.org> Subject: Re: Person and fictional Re: VideoGame proposal So this is very much like... Richard's proposal : http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/FictionalThing Where he does something like: <div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Place"> <link itemprop="additionalType" href="http://schema.org/FictionalThing"/> City of: <span itemprop="name">Paris</span><br/> But Jeff, your saying to perhaps do something like: <div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Place" fictional="true"> City of: <span itemprop="name">Paris</span><br/> Yes ? No ? On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org<mailto:jyoung@oclc.org>> wrote: If the movie and the director are both fictional, then schema:fictional=true could be assigned to both separately. The relationship between them would be schema:director (which doesn’t need to be tagged as “fictional”). The fact that a fictional movie might happen to be schema:genre=”Science fiction” is merely a coincidence. Jeff From: Thad Guidry [mailto:thadguidry@gmail.com<mailto:thadguidry@gmail.com>] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:23 PM To: Young,Jeff (OR) Cc: chaals@yandex-team.ru<mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru>; Dan Scott; Dan Brickley; Peter F.Patel-Schneider; Wallis,Richard; martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org<mailto:martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>; Karen Coyle; <public-vocabs@w3.org<mailto:public-vocabs@w3.org>> Subject: Re: Person and fictional Re: VideoGame proposal Jeff... ok... Is this... schema:fictional false; # to be pedantic about it A property to be used on ANY Schema.org Type ? How would it work against say... <div itemscope itemtype ="http://schema.org/Movie"> <h1 itemprop="name">Avatar</h1> <span>Director: <span itemprop="director">James Cameron</span> (born August 16, 1954)</span> <span itemprop="genre">Science fiction</span> <a href="../movies/avatar-theatrical-trailer.html" itemprop="trailer">Trailer</a> </div> What would the changes needed look like on the code above , if both itemtype="http://schema.org/Movie" and itemprop="director" were both Fictional ? -- -Thad +ThadGuidry<https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> Thad on LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org<mailto:jyoung@oclc.org>> wrote: Here’s how I imagine splitting the hair: _:A0 a schema:Book; schema:name “Anna Karenina”; schema:fictional false; # to be pedantic about it schema:about _:A1; schema:genre “Fiction”; . _:A1 a schema:Person; schema:fictional true; schema:name “Anna Karenina”; . -- -Thad +ThadGuidry<https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> Thad on LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
Received on Monday, 20 October 2014 20:16:49 UTC