Liking the ‘subtle’ changes since the last version! Not sure that picking illustrator out as a specific property for BookSeries makes particular sense - its already a property of Book anyway and illustrators may well differ from book to book in a series. I would drop it for now. There may be BookSeries properties that could be added at a later date - seriesEditor comes to mind - but perhaps identifying them at a later date may be more appropriate. ~Richard On 19 Nov 2014, at 21:31, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com<mailto:danbri@google.com>> wrote: On 19 November 2014 20:02, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com<mailto:thadguidry@gmail.com>> wrote: Last paragraph description quibble: "It is common for properties applicable to an item from the series to be usefully applied to the containing group. Schema.org<http://Schema.org> attempts to anticipate some of these cases, but publishers should be free to apply properties of the series items to the series as a whole wherever they seem appropriate." Hmm... on the last paragraph in the description....when we say "item" and "series items"...can we instead rephrase with "part(s)", in keeping with convention of Series hasPart/isPartOf ? Good point. We now have "but publishers should be free to apply properties of the series parts to the series as a whole wherever they seem appropriate." - I hope this is enough to reinforce the part/whole thinking. http://sdo-venkman.appspot.com/Series cheers, Dan
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2014 22:31:11 UTC